« Dylan, Gnarls top RS picks | Main | A 'bigger bang' indeed »

My rock 'n' roll rant

Dsc00134_1 Musing on the current crop of rock musicians and the 'sad state' of the rock world.

"The rock world is in a sad state if Bob Dylan's "Modern Times" was the # 1 album," responded "Don" to my last blog post. "This was definitely Dylan's best album in many years but nowhere in the ball park of his 60's and early 70's albums."

I started to write a pithy response in agreement with Don's comment. It blossomed into a full-scale rant. Wait until your boss takes a long lunch break or you're at home with a glass of wine in hand and then see if you agree with my theory.

Lack of virtuoso and roots music knowledge. That's why the rock world is is in a sad state. Kids learn three chords on the expensive guitar mom bought 'em and start a band called something like School Cafeteria Survivors (SCS).

SCS gets all their friends from their giant high school on their MySpace page. They wear tight jeans and eye-liner. They promise promoters they will bring their 200 hundred friends to a show and land local gigs.

Then they get invited to play Warped Tour. Next, they get signed by a major label. The kids are taken into a recording studio where machines make sure the singer is on key and multi-track layering obscures the guitarist's lack of chops.  A session drummer is used but the fact is never made public.

Magazines like Rolling Stone get millions of advertising dollars from the music industry so even the weakest studio efforts usually walk away with a minimum 2 1/2 star, more likely, 3 star review.

No one ever tells these teenagers in SCS to go back to their room and practice, practice, practice before taking the stage. Their teenage friends with their tin ears don't realize how cruddy it all sounds. They just want a chorus about not fitting in at school to sing along with while surrounded by 200 or 2,000 other misunderstood souls who all happen to dress exactly the same.

Guitar great Johnny Winter told me he practiced 5 or 6 hours a day. The rest of the time he spent listening to old blues record so he could steal/learn their licks. Kids are lazy today and justify their lack of chops by pointing to punk rock losers like Sid Vicious.

Derek Trucks, Robert Randolph, Dan Aeurbach (The Black Keys), Jack White, John Mayer (he's a mean blues/rock guitarists when he so chooses) are the only guitarists I can think of (I'm sure a few young greats slipped my mind) who are under 30 and can really bring it. Oh yeah, and my man Damon Fowler (pictured), who lives in Brandon. Check him out at www.damonfowler.com.   

We also have an overwhelming shortage of awesome vocalists, ones that can bring raw power  and real emotion like Robert Plant, Rod Stewart, Gregg Allman or Bob Seger did in their prime. Why? Kids don't put in the hours to learn how to sing. Allman likes to talk about spending many, many nights in Daytona blues bars learning from men much older than him before he perfected the rasp that makes "Melissa" and other Brothers classics so beautiful.

Great rock music is steeped in the blues and the rock 'n' roll invented by Chuck Berry. The linchpin of every great rock band is the pairing of an amazing guitarist and an equally enchanting vocalist, or a combination of both (think Jack White).

First-rate songwriting, which also only comes with countless hours of practice is the other key ingredient. Jimi Hendrix is Jimi Hendrix because of his mind-blowing guitar chops. But he is also Jimi Hendrix because he could pen and croon a top shelf ballad like "The Wind Cries Mary."

Do the kids writing woe-is-me junk today even know who T.S. Eliot is? I recall reading that Hendrix got into Eliot while backing Little Richard.  Or maybe it was Dylan that Hendrix got into while touring with Richard and that led him to Eliot. You get the point.

Bands like Pearl Jam and The White Stripes appeal to rock fans young and old because they have the key ingredients to greatness. The Rolling Stones, Aerosmith, Bruce Springsteen, Bob Dylan and the other giants of the 1960s and 1970s continue to outstrip the majority of today's bands because most teens and twentysomethings are merely trying to live up to the standard set by 1990s-era Green Day records or even worse, blink-182.

The so-called alternative rock of today is fun but rarely sticks to the bones like the classic rock created in the 1960s and '70s. That music was made by men and women with bona-fide chops who gobbled up every old record they could get their hands on before creating music of their own. But who wants to devour ancient roots music and spend hours practicing when you can blast bad guys or steal cars on PlayStation?

December 13, 2006 | Permalink

Comments

I'd like to give "Don" a golf clap for inspiring you. That's the best thing you've written since your Hunter S. Thompson piece.
I read it then I read it again.
Bravo.

Posted by: kellie | Dec 13, 2006 12:15:41 PM

well said!

Posted by: Greg | Dec 14, 2006 3:46:42 AM

White Stripes were/are a joke & fit your definition of "no chops" to a t, in my opinion. They'll never be Cream, man.
But you hit the nail on the head in lots of other places.

Posted by: Anton Anonymouse | Dec 14, 2006 8:48:28 AM

Sorry, but I think this is a total crock.

I will address two reasons:

The number of rock and roll bands for whom virtuosity is a significant factor is small, and never defining. Take, for example, the Yardbirds. Lots of virtuosity, but not enough songwriting.

You give no adequate explanation of why kids should have tin ears now more than they did whenever you think was the golden age. Playstation? Kids have always had multiple interests. TV is not new. They can do more than one thing.

I think you're just wrong. 'Hey Ya' by Outkast, or 'Crazy in Love' by Beyonce and Jay-Z are great songs. Great songs always outlive great musicians.

It's not a perfect world, or a perfect music industry, but there's plenty of great music around, Rock and otherwise. I love garage rock, myself, and there's loads of great groups in that genre, who understand and transform their musical heritage. Do you know or like the Reigning Sound, Dead Moon, John Schooley, etc etc. They're not getting much coverage in the mainstream media, though.

Posted by: nora | Dec 14, 2006 10:31:19 AM

Coverage in the mainstream media, indeed. Dead Moon broke up earlier this week.

THe point isn't that there aren't good songs. The point that kids these days are learning from the Dave Matthews songbook or the Staind songbook instead of the chuck berry songbook or the keith richards songbook. there are no basics or appreciation for the basics.

Posted by: clr | Dec 14, 2006 12:02:46 PM

Well, I just addressed two objections, and I specified 'songs' in opposition to virtuosity.

And do you agree with his point that kids are learning from the Staind songbook instead of the Keith Richards songbook? I don't know, but it doesn't seem likely.

Posted by: nora | Dec 14, 2006 3:36:11 PM

"...or even worse, Blink-182?" Blink 182's last CD was an incredible piece of rock music. And what about the Killer's "Mr. Brightside?" I grew up in the age of classic rock and I'm here to say classic rock sucks! So this rant is just another one of those "they don't make them like they used to," and to that I say "thank goodness." But classic rock stations do serve one purpose: they entertain the deadbeats from that era, who while driving their Camaros refuse to step up to modern times.

Posted by: Mark Diorio | Dec 14, 2006 3:57:14 PM

Nora: "Hey Ya" might be the best pop song of recent memory. Andre 3000 and Jay-Z are amazing talents. But I wanted to focus my essay on rock music.

I think young people hear a Richard's riff and are impressed but find it is much easier to copy a Green Day lick instead. That's also why I believe there are so few modern slide guitar players — it's hard! Duane Allman skipped school and spent entire days and nights mastering the instrument, just like the blind blues men who invented the style.

The main point of my "rant" was that today's aspiring rock musicians don't put in the incredible hours of practicing and studying from the past. Bob Dylan is the greatest pilferer of all time. That's part of his genius. When you steal/borrow from enough sources you are creating.

Beck is a perfect example. The reason he is one of the few modern artists that continues to prove interesting is his amazing knowledge of what has come before him — from honky tonk to techno, the man is on top of it.

I've interviewed legends and fresh-faced local bands. Too many young musicians lack the knowledge and passion to practice "5 or 6 hours a day." At least that's what I've gleaned from writing about music and hanging out with fellow twentysomethings. Thanks for the feedback everyone.

Posted by: Wade T. | Dec 14, 2006 4:17:41 PM

Maybe everything that could be done with the greatest marketing opportunity of all time - rock 'n' roll - has been done and all that remains is endless revision by people motivated by celebrity and wealth. Every Christmas there is a revolutionary new electric razor; better, brighter and sharper than the last one -it'll shave you down to your very soul. Every new music format brings another re-issue of Lord McCartney's and Saint Yoko's milch cow. Every edition of Rolling Stone or Q magazine brings more product to be slavishly commended by those poncing a living on the Industry. It's all commerce, like coca cola.

All the dead, blind mississippeans, not all of whom were called Willie, scratched a living, at best; imperfect and out of tune, though, theirs was a synthesis of oppression and of a proximity to frailty, betrayal and death in which their playing was the only catharsis; virtuosity and accomplishment were the handmaidens of the blues, not its genesis. CockRock is something else and it doesn't matter how adept one particular person is at strangling a Stratocaster, their wish is to be adored, feted and showered with money and drugs and uncritical adoration. It is a mark of the temper of the times that otherwise sensible people rush to buy an album by a pampered white multi-multi-millionaire - anybody you like really, Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, the imbecile Bono - in order to be lectured on the plight of the working man by those who have never done a day's work in their lives.

The world abounds with music of value. Instead of lamenting the poverty of ShowBusiness USA Industry music people should just accept that, like MacDonalds, its crap and find something else.

If its music you want try Africa or India or, notably, any of the Stans not bombed to bits by Uncle Sam. Or try the magnificence of the Baroque or Romantic Classical periods or the riffs, reels and ragas of the Incredible String Band. In the States, as well as the Blues, you have a fabulous (European) mountain music tradition that hasn't been entirely hijacked by Emmylou and you have the swaggering, brassy, cosmopolitan Gershwin and Bernstein. And much, much else. If you want to continue to be frustrated and unsatisfied, overcharged and despised then just keep on sending your money to those nice folks at Rolling Stone; they'll sell you any old shit.

Posted by: tasty macfadden | Dec 14, 2006 5:57:01 PM

a-f***in' men, dude.
you freekin nailed it...right on the money.
you can't build a house with no foundation, it will sink or collapse...just like these kids the corporations thrive on.
they have no roots in any of the sacred common ancestry of rocknroll and mother blues....release a hit song or two, and then spend lives of obscurity in most cases...while the corporation grows phat and satisfied ever more....and we all suffer as there are rarely true practitioners of the art to testify and keep the MUSIC alive.
sorry...but using a goddamn gate to sink a detuned guitar with a bass drum going duh-duh.....duh-duh.... while some pinhead rants and raves about the size of his huge -ass ego thru an antares auto tune plug set on shred does NOT music make.
all i hear is generic-ass bs, over and over....almost all this crud sounds the same, and even alot of older guys like me are doing it to cash in.
back in the day, we used to sleep with our guitars, carry 'em everywhere constantly playing and playing....it was all about the three basic food groups...(that's Sex and Drugs and Rocknroll, to you young whippersnappers..)...now you don't need any foundation, you can read a magazine that tells you where to place your fingers and when (complete with BASSLINES for your slightly more doltish bud that can't handle "blazin' the six-string, dude") on the guitar soccer mom bought at GC that you don't even know how to play, ya just crank the distorto-matic up to overload and drop your bass string a whole step and have at it.
gimme a break.
to quote the late Carl Perkins,
"A Song ain't a Song that ain't got a lick of Blues in it".
and 99% of the "musicians" out there wouldn;t know the blues if it smacked them across the face with a pink salami grinder.
the whole rocknroll culture has stagnated because of this crud, the corporations that support (and suport ghoulishly to keep the coffers overflowing i mean at the expense of both performer and listener...face it, it's big business sucking up all them kid's money...)it and all....
while all the really good musicians i've met supported or heard all over the place labour away in obscurity, many true visionaries never to be heard...until the internet set them free on the world.
of course, the dumbass government has to protect the riaa and other such entities from letting indie people "share files",,,they want THEIR pound of flesh at all costs...i say screw 'em....corporate rock STILL sux.
all i can say is that if you want to hear actual rocknroll, go TRUE indie stuff...not pablum, but th crap actual musicians that actually play and write and sing and record and produce stuff themselves are the only way ya ever seem to hear any actual, well...talent anymore.
i like atonal noise as much as the next guy,
hell, i love every single thing Zappa ever did (yah, i know i'm weird)but the current state of rocknroll sux total f***in' ass...for every single reason you posted, dude, and a whole lot more than that even.
sorry for the rant....lol...
happy holidays to all!
peace
pjp

Posted by: pinkster j. photonymus | Dec 15, 2006 4:10:44 AM

Well all I can say is that there are some pretty good coments going on here.....

Now having said that if you are a true musician and have your own music written and recorded and maybe you have a video of your band or yourself just lying around and doing nothing, then try out www.indiehitz.net based out of spring hill, fl.

Artists get 500mg of web space song uploads, bio's, picture uploads, and beable to stream your music or video right from your web page there....They already have quite a few Florida based bands as well as bands from all over the world......

I suggest you look for Jimi Pocius, Avalanche, The Easton Brothers band, Maria Daines and Paul killington, just for starters....They even have radio shows wich are coming very soon with live dj's how kewl is that......

Just thought I would pass this info along.
hope everyone has a great Holiday.
Merry Christmas to all.

TMH

Posted by: Terry Martin | Dec 15, 2006 7:01:17 AM

lol...funny you should mention me, Terry, lol.....

Posted by: pinkster j. photonymus | Dec 15, 2006 3:50:33 PM

VERY well said my Brother! We can only hope the next generation will, in their self-deprecating frustration, actually EMBRACE the work ethic of the past that we draw on, as well as maybe even OUR humble contributions to our ART. And THERE lies the crux of the problem. WE consider our music our ART, our RELIGION, not as a means to fill our IRA's and piggybanks with enough to be able to live like the ASSHOLES we all truly want to be or already ARE! Holy SHIT! I'm a gen-X crybaby! HELP ME, HELP ME, HELP ME.......!!!!!!
e

Posted by: Mark Easton | Dec 15, 2006 3:52:36 PM

Recipe for rock success today:

Sharp-pointed, $3,000 Ibanez guitar. Digital amp. Black clothes. Various armbands/tape around fingers/tattoos/piercings. Lyrics about "the walls closing in" on your life and darkness in your soul because mom wouldn't give you the SUV for a night at Applebees.

Recipe for rock success yesterday:
Raggedy old Fender strat. Marshall stacks. More Marshall stacks. Another Marshall stack, just in case you can't hear the first two. Wear whatever you want/frilly shirt. Lyrics about... well... we still don't know because they were written well enough to be interpreted a gazillion different ways. The real blues.

And ATTITUDE.

How many bands can pull off real attitude today? Saliva? Nickelback? Staind? I've heard more attitude in Christian rock.

By the way, when I played, it was with a Fender strat and two Marshall stacks, so I admit I am not perfect.

Posted by: Brian @ ft. liquordale | Dec 19, 2006 11:14:00 AM

Ladies and gentlemen...

We have broken the blog comment record.

Wade. You're the man, well said. However, there IS some interesting modern rock popping up, you just have to look REALLY hard for it. It's being played by people you've never heard of. People that will never get a record deal, and people that will be ecstatic if they sell 500 copies of thier CD.

They're called local musicians, and they're located from seattle to miami. And best of all, right around the corner from your house.

Half the fun is searching for it.

Posted by: Ben Bakker | Dec 19, 2006 6:51:51 PM

Well said. Your assessment of current music is absolutely right on. I would love to know what today's kids will be listening to in their 60s and 70s--will there really be oldies stations half a century hence, playing the Strokes and Panic! at the Disco? Hard to imagine, but then who expected to still be hearing the Beatles and the Stones in the 21st century back in '64 and '65?

But what I'd like to address is the explanation for why music has become so lame. You are I think right that the lack of studiousness hurts the artists of today. The great art of the past all comes from guys spending hours upon hours studying what's been done: think of Bob Dylan in his Hibbing bedroom, listening and copying Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, Little Richard, Buddy Holly, and special ordering all the blues and country classics of the past; then absorbing Harry Smith; then the Beats and other poets; literature; the New York Public Library, etc., etc. Or think of Bruce Springsteen studying Sam Moore's vocal technique. Or Dave and Phil Alvin studying Big Joe Turner and others.

But teenagers, or the mass of them, have never been that studious. How'd all this happen? I think it's because so many of these people were outsiders, oddballs, a little estranged from the popular crowds. They were attracted to forms of music--blues, folk, country--that were also on the periphery, as well as to ideas outside the mainstream, and out of all that absorption came rock n' roll.

What's mainstream, what is most popular, is always mediocre. Rock has become mainstream--it's everywhere. You don't need to search it out now. It's there in the hospital when you're born and it's played at your funeral. In between, you get it at baseball games, presidential inaugerals, and truck commercials. Any information you need is instantly available on the internet, from the lyrics to "Louie, Louie," to the life stories of old bluesmen, to whatever arcania may tickle your curiosity.

The moral is simply this: success kills art!

Posted by: Johnny | Dec 28, 2006 1:58:28 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
About HeraldToday.com | About the Real Cities Network | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement | About Knight Ridder | Copyright